Search found 247 matches

by Jemoh66
Wed Mar 13, 2019 7:50 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Prov 30:3
Replies: 11
Views: 603

Re: Prov 30:3

For the record the LXX actually reads closer to my translation The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom, and the counsel of saints is understanding: The Targum reads word for word like Hebrew, שֵׁירוּי דְחָכְמְתָא דְחַלְתֵּיהּ דֶאֱלָהָא וִידִיעֲתָא דְקַדִישֵׁי בְיוּנָא: The reference is eithe...
by Jemoh66
Thu Mar 07, 2019 10:43 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Prov 30:3
Replies: 11
Views: 603

Re: Prov 30:3

I like that Karl. I would also add that I think the second phrase, וְדַ֖עַת קְדֹשִׁ֣ים אֵדָֽע, is referring to holy beings, that is what holy beings know.

I haven't learned wisdom that I should know what the holy ones know.
by Jemoh66
Thu Dec 20, 2018 3:33 am
Forum: Beginners' Forum
Topic: Is this analysis of Isaiah 9:6 a legitimate one?
Replies: 21
Views: 921

Re: Is this analysis of Isaiah 9:6 a legitimate one?

The JPS translators are certainly not trinitarian. Their translation supports the traditional view. JPS 9:5 For a child is born unto us, A son is given unto us; And the government is upon his shoulder; And his name is called Pele-joez-el-gibbor-Abi-ad-sar-shalom; Notice also they treat all the names...
by Jemoh66
Sat Nov 17, 2018 2:41 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: is yashku really a hiphil imperfect? I see no yud or hirik!
Replies: 6
Views: 443

Re: is yashku really a hiphil imperfect? I see no yud or hirik!

Well the first thing I noticed is the hey is not apocopated. So it is behaving like a strong verb. Most likely an older form preserved in Job because it's poetry. That's just of the to of my head. I'll look into this now a little closer.
by Jemoh66
Sat Nov 17, 2018 3:56 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: is yashku really a hiphil imperfect? I see no yud or hirik!
Replies: 6
Views: 443

Re: is yashku really a hiphil imperfect? I see no yud or hirik!

Yes the Pathak in the prefix is the tell. It's a weak verb (Final hey) that's why there's no hirik. The causative is not only common, it fits the context. Notice Jacob removes the stone and Waters the docks himself. וַיִּגַּ֣שׁ יַעֲקֹ֗ב וַיָּ֤גֶל אֶת־הָאֶ֙בֶן֙ מֵעַל֙ פִּ֣י הַבְּאֵ֔ר וַיַּ֕שְׁקְ אֶת־...
by Jemoh66
Tue Sep 25, 2018 8:25 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Genesis 2:6 and the aspects
Replies: 4
Views: 482

Re: Genesis 2:6 and the aspects

I built this chart showing how Moses uses the same macro-structure in both creation accounts.

Screen Shot 2018-09-25 at 7.19.37 PM.png
Screen Shot 2018-09-25 at 7.19.37 PM.png (85.49 KiB) Viewed 447 times
by Jemoh66
Thu Jul 19, 2018 11:20 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Hard to explain question about a verb ending
Replies: 7
Views: 427

Re: Hard to explain question about a verb ending

Also I noticed footnote 4. It is, however, a question whether, instead of a connecting syllable, we should not assume a special verbal form, analogous to the Arabic energetic mood (see l, at the end) and probably also appearing in the Hebrew cohortative (see the footnote on §48c).—As M. Lambert has ...
by Jemoh66
Thu Jul 19, 2018 11:18 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Hard to explain question about a verb ending
Replies: 7
Views: 427

Re: Hard to explain question about a verb ending

58l That the forms with Nûn energicum are intended to give greater emphasis to the verbal form is seen from their special frequency in pause. Apart from the verb, however, Nûn energicum occurs also in the union of suffixes with certain particles (§100o). This Nûn is frequent in Western Aramaic. In A...
by Jemoh66
Thu Jul 19, 2018 11:17 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Hard to explain question about a verb ending
Replies: 7
Views: 427

Re: Hard to explain question about a verb ending

Continued 58k Rem. The uncontracted forms with Nûn are rare, and occur only in poetic or elevated style (Ex 152, Dt 3210 [bis], Jer 522, 2224); they are never found in the 3rd fem. sing. and 1st plur. On the other hand, the contracted forms are tolerably frequent, even in prose. An example of ־ֶ֫ נּ...
by Jemoh66
Thu Jul 19, 2018 11:04 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Hard to explain question about a verb ending
Replies: 7
Views: 427

Re: Hard to explain question about a verb ending

Continued 2nd pers. ־ֶ֫ ךָּ‎ (Jer 2224 in pause ־ֶנְךָּ‎) and, only orthographically different, ־ֶ֫ כָּה‎ (Is 1024, Pr 211 in pause). 3rd pers. ־ֶ֫ נּוּ‎ (for ־ֶ֫ נְהוּ‎),[7] fem. ־ֶ֫ נָּה‎ for ־ֶ֫ נְהָ‎. [1st pers. plur. ־ֶ֫ נּוּ‎ (for ־ֶ֫ נְנוּ‎), see the Rem.] In the other persons Nûn energetic d...

Go to advanced search