Why is there a maqqeph?

Discussion must focus on the Hebrew text (including text criticism) and its ancient translations, not on archaeology, modern language translations, or theological controversies.
Forum rules
Members will observe the rules for respectful discourse at all times!
Please sign all posts with your first and last (family) name.
Post Reply
CowboysDad
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2015 5:38 pm

Why is there a maqqeph?

Post by CowboysDad »

Why is there a maqqeph between עַד and מָתַי in 1 Samuel 16:1? There are so many other places where a maqqeph is not used with עַד.
Daniel McCabe, ThM, DMin
User avatar
Jason Hare
Posts: 1923
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2013 5:07 am
Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
Contact:

Re: Why is there a maqqeph?

Post by Jason Hare »

It's normal for the מַקָּף maqqāp̄ to be used after עַד because the latter tends to be an enclitic (to use a term stressed in Greek study). It doesn't have an accent of its own but lends its accent to the next word. The same is true of words like אֶל "to toward," עַל "on, about," and אֶת ("with" or the definite direct object marker). Although they don't have to be followed by maqqāp̄, they tend to be (and to have their accents shifted to the word that follows).

Think of Greek ἄνθρωπός τις "a certain man," where τις shifts its accent to the word that precedes it.

In the case of something like עַד־הָעִיר, the preposition would be enclitic and have no accent of its own; while in the case of עַד הָעִיר, the preposition has its own accent. Look at the accentuation of the trope in various examples, and you will see what I mean.
Jason Hare
Tel Aviv, Israel
The Hebrew Café
יוֹדֵ֣עַ צַ֭דִּיק נֶ֣פֶשׁ בְּהֶמְתּ֑וֹ וְֽרַחֲמֵ֥י רְ֝שָׁעִ֗ים אַכְזָרִֽי׃
ספר משלי י״ב, י׳
User avatar
Kirk Lowery
Site Admin
Posts: 363
Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 12:03 pm
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Contact:

Re: Why is there a maqqeph?

Post by Kirk Lowery »

Jason,

Do you know if the Masoretes had specific rules for determining when to add a maqqaf, or is it simply preserving the observed intonation of the Tiberian pronunciation?
Kirk E. Lowery, PhD
B-Hebrew Site Administrator & Moderator
blog: https://blogs.emdros.org/eh
User avatar
Jason Hare
Posts: 1923
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2013 5:07 am
Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
Contact:

Re: Why is there a maqqeph?

Post by Jason Hare »

Kirk Lowery wrote:Jason,

Do you know if the Masoretes had specific rules for determining when to add a maqqaf, or is it simply preserving the observed intonation of the Tiberian pronunciation?
I don't see a pattern or hard and fast rules with regard to this. In my thinking, it is connected only to the creation of phrases in trope. Greek has specific rules about enclitics and how they transfer their accent, but Hebrew can have:

יהו֫ה יִשְׁמָר־צֵאתְךָ֫ וּבוֹאֶ֫ךָ
Psalm 121:8

in which יִשְׁמֹ֫ר yišmṓr becomes enclitic as יִשְׁמָר־‎◌֫ yišmor-◌́ in this verse (in the phrase יִשְׁמָר־צֵאתְךָ֫). It is used both with an objective pronominal suffix (יִשְׁמָרְךָ֫ yišmorḵā́) and in the normal long form (יִשְׁמֹ֫ר yišmṓr) in the verse previous to this one.

I don't think we should expect any pattern except as it fits with the Masoretes' desire for phrase flow and word stress.
Jason Hare
Tel Aviv, Israel
The Hebrew Café
יוֹדֵ֣עַ צַ֭דִּיק נֶ֣פֶשׁ בְּהֶמְתּ֑וֹ וְֽרַחֲמֵ֥י רְ֝שָׁעִ֗ים אַכְזָרִֽי׃
ספר משלי י״ב, י׳
CowboysDad
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2015 5:38 pm

Re: Why is there a maqqeph?

Post by CowboysDad »

Thanks so much! That was the help I needed.
Daniel McCabe, ThM, DMin
Post Reply