Some scholars (e.g., Paul D. Wegner, H.G.M. WIlliamson, John Goldingay) separate the four names in Isaiah 9:6 into two clauses, thus resulting in two theophoric names. Paul D. Wegner for example writes:
"This interpretation would be favoured by: (1) its similarity to the parallel structure in the name Maher-shalal-hash-baz; (2) the translation of sem as one name which the singular form suggests; (3) the Masoretic pointing; and (4) the common pattern in theophoric names. If this interpretation is correct, the name would then be translated as "wonderful planner [is] the mighty God; the Father of eternity [is] a prince of peace [or well-being]." (Wegner 1992: 111)
Thoughts?
Theophoric names in Isaiah 9:6?
Forum rules
Members will observe the rules for respectful discourse at all times!
Please sign all posts with your first and last (family) name.
Members will observe the rules for respectful discourse at all times!
Please sign all posts with your first and last (family) name.
- Jason Hare
- Posts: 1923
- Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2013 5:07 am
- Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
- Contact:
Re: Theophoric names in Isaiah 9:6?
The only problem I see in that quote is that the initial quotation marks are never closed.
Jason Hare
Tel Aviv, Israel
The Hebrew Café
יוֹדֵ֣עַ צַ֭דִּיק נֶ֣פֶשׁ בְּהֶמְתּ֑וֹ וְֽרַחֲמֵ֥י רְ֝שָׁעִ֗ים אַכְזָרִֽי׃
ספר משלי י״ב, י׳
Tel Aviv, Israel
The Hebrew Café
יוֹדֵ֣עַ צַ֭דִּיק נֶ֣פֶשׁ בְּהֶמְתּ֑וֹ וְֽרַחֲמֵ֥י רְ֝שָׁעִ֗ים אַכְזָרִֽי׃
ספר משלי י״ב, י׳
-
- Posts: 1541
- Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2013 12:51 am
Re: Theophoric names in Isaiah 9:6?
Ethan: the first thing I noticed is that the verse is Isaiah 9:5, not 9:6.
The Masoretic pointing can safely be ignored, It’s wrong often enough as to be untrustworthy.
Wegner claims that the singular “name” indicates one name, yet he splits it up into two.
The other option is to recognize that “name” is also used in the sense of fame or reputation. Thus the singular “name” can be followed by a list of attributes that describe his reputation.
Karl W. Randolph.
The Masoretic pointing can safely be ignored, It’s wrong often enough as to be untrustworthy.
Wegner claims that the singular “name” indicates one name, yet he splits it up into two.
The other option is to recognize that “name” is also used in the sense of fame or reputation. Thus the singular “name” can be followed by a list of attributes that describe his reputation.
Karl W. Randolph.