Have you considered making your own analysis instead of relying on others?
There are many misreadings of the MT as witnessed by the most of the Kethiv/Qere pairs found there. So why not also we today?s readers?
You don’t need to show a whole article, all you need is to quote alternate readings found in other MSS. Anything else is mere speculation.jwmealy wrote: ↑Tue Jul 04, 2023 9:54 am or of the MT text with a small misspelling here or there, … I have written a technical paper that demonstrates this in detail, and I'd be happy to share it with you. If you like you can email me and I will send it to you as an attachment. webb at selftest dot net (@ for at, . for dot). Alternatively, if there is a way to upload files to this forum I will be glad to do that.
Yes, I’m being a bit cryptic here, because I want to see if you can produce either an alternate reading found in a MSS, or an alternate understanding of the MT. I find myself dissatisfied with mere speculation.
Karl W. Randolph.