Hebrew Tenses According To Thomas Newberry

Classical Hebrew morphology and syntax, aspect, linguistics, discourse analysis, and related topics
Forum rules
Members will observe the rules for respectful discourse at all times!
Please sign all posts with your first and last (family) name.
Post Reply
Moses Gummadi
Posts: 29
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2021 10:15 am

Hebrew Tenses According To Thomas Newberry

Post by Moses Gummadi »

In the "Englishman's Bible" (Newberry Study Bible, link here), Thomas Newberry gives the following classification of the Hebrew "tenses". I am used to understand the verbs as Perfect (Qatal), Imperfect (Yiktol), Wayyiqtol and Weqatal, besides infinitives, imperatives, etc.

I have attached 3 pages of his verbal classification below. I think he calls Qatal as "short tense", and Yiqtol as "long tense". Wonder what he means by intermediate tense. He divides Qatal and Yiqtol into past, present future tense with examples. Can some one (esp. Jason Hare) please give their opinion on Mr.Newberry's system? Also perhaps suggest a classification table (if there is one) within the standard grammar books (I haven't found one Weingreen, Gesenius). Thank you.

Image
Image
Image
Moses Gummadi
יִרְאֵי יְהוָה בִּטְחוּ בַיהוָה
kwrandolph
Posts: 1531
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2013 12:51 am

Re: Hebrew Tenses According To Thomas Newberry

Post by kwrandolph »

Thomas Newberry sounds confused. “Tense” refers to a time stamp, that one form always refers to the past, another for present and yet another for future. Yet he admits that both of what he calls “tenses” can refer to all three time references. With that being the case, those are not tenses.

He also brings up aspect and modality, are one of those accurate?

Karl W. Randolph.
talmid56
Posts: 295
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2013 9:02 am
Location: Carlisle, Arkansas, USA

Re: Hebrew Tenses According To Thomas Newberry

Post by talmid56 »

I have never heard of his classification of Hebrew "tenses". I've been reading Benjamin Noonan's Advances in the Study of Biblical Hebrew and Aramaic, and none of the current BH scholars and linguists he discusses use such classifications. Perhaps he was influenced by Driver, but he didn't use the same categories either.
Dewayne Dulaney
דואיין דוליני

Blog: https://letancientvoicesspeak.wordpress.com/

כִּ֤י שֶׁ֨מֶשׁ׀ וּמָגֵן֮ יְהוָ֪ה אֱלֹ֫הִ֥ים חֵ֣ן וְ֭כָבוֹד יִתֵּ֣ן יְהוָ֑ה לֹ֥א יִמְנַע־ט֝֗וֹב לַֽהֹלְכִ֥ים בְּתָמִֽים׃
--(E 84:11) 84:12 תהלים
User avatar
Jason Hare
Posts: 1920
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2013 5:07 am
Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
Contact:

Re: Hebrew Tenses According To Thomas Newberry

Post by Jason Hare »

I don’t like that the author wrote וְיַעֲשֶׂה (vəyaʿăśeh) instead of either וַיַּעֲשֶׂה (vayyaʿăśeh) or (the more common) וַיַּ֫עַשׂ (vayyáʿaś) for “and he did” (middle of page vii). In past tense contexts, the former is vav + imperfect (translated as “and he would do” or “and he used to do”) or veyiqtol; the latter is vayyiqtol. These are hardly the same thing.
Jason Hare
Tel Aviv, Israel
The Hebrew Café
יוֹדֵ֣עַ צַ֭דִּיק נֶ֣פֶשׁ בְּהֶמְתּ֑וֹ וְֽרַחֲמֵ֥י רְ֝שָׁעִ֗ים אַכְזָרִֽי׃
ספר משלי י״ב, י׳
Moses Gummadi
Posts: 29
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2021 10:15 am

Re: Hebrew Tenses According To Thomas Newberry

Post by Moses Gummadi »

Thanks Karl, Dewayne and Jason.
Moses Gummadi
יִרְאֵי יְהוָה בִּטְחוּ בַיהוָה
Post Reply