Lete-Biblical Hebrew, or Proto-Mishnaic, or Mishnaic Hebrew in Babylonian - Persian Period?

For discussion of post-biblical Hebrew texts and/or comparison to biblical Hebrew structure and lexis.
Post Reply
BryantIII
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2013 10:41 am

Lete-Biblical Hebrew, or Proto-Mishnaic, or Mishnaic Hebrew in Babylonian - Persian Period?

Post by BryantIII »

Dear List,

Jan Joosten has posted a new article entitled,

"On the History of Hebrew after the Fall of Jerusalem."

Link:
https://www.academia.edu/123922238/On_t ... _Jerusalem.
oo
It is 49 pagesk and is downloadable as a pdf file.

Brief Abstract:

"Linguistic evidence indicates that an early form of Mishnaic Hebrew came into being over a relatively short period between the end of the sixth and the end of the fifth century BCE. Historical reasoning suggests that the most likely backdrop for the formation of this new form of Hebrew is the return of Judean exiles from Babylonian exile. The birth of proto-MH inaugurated a long period of diglossia, various effects of which can be observed in the texts from this period."
En Xristwi
Rev. Bryant J. Williams III
talmid56
Posts: 338
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2013 9:02 am
Location: Carlisle, Arkansas, USA

Re: Lete-Biblical Hebrew, or Proto-Mishnaic, or Mishnaic Hebrew in Babylonian - Persian Period?

Post by talmid56 »

I'm reading it now. Anything Joosten writes is worth reading and considering, in my view.
Dewayne Dulaney
דואיין דוליני
ܕܘܝܢ ܕܘܠܝܢܝ

Blog: https://letancientvoicesspeak.wordpress.com/

כִּ֤י שֶׁ֨מֶשׁ׀ וּמָגֵן֮ יְהוָ֪ה אֱלֹ֫הִ֥ים חֵ֣ן וְ֭כָבוֹד יִתֵּ֣ן יְהוָ֑ה לֹ֥א יִמְנַע־ט֝֗וֹב לַֽהֹלְכִ֥ים בְּתָמִֽים׃
--(E 84:11) 84:12 תהלים
Post Reply