Isa 59:20 compared to Rom 11:26

The main place for discussion the Hebrew Bible, its language and message.
Forum rules
Members will observe the rules for respectful discourse at all times!
Please sign all posts with your first and last (family) name.
User avatar
SteveMiller
Posts: 174
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 7:53 pm
Location: Detroit, MI, USA
Contact:

Re: Isa 59:20 compared to Rom 11:26

Postby SteveMiller » Thu May 18, 2017 10:56 pm

Thanks very much, Karl.

kwrandolph wrote:When a participle is a noun, it usually refers to an actor or an action.

Do you know an example where a participle refers to an action rather than an actor?

kwrandolph wrote:These are notes concerning my musings on the participle, if you can improve on them, I’d be glad to hear about improvements. This may give you a start.

Thanks very much. I have copied it to start my notebook on the subject.

The fact that שבי would be plural if it were from שוב is one of the problems I have with the traditional translation. It’s equally a problem with your translation. That the noun there is a plural, that is one of the reasons I considered “captive” as the translation.


Why would שבי being plural be a problem for the traditional translation "and for them that turn away sin"?
In my translation, I was thinking plural may be a problem because the subject, "redeemer", is singular, but that doesn't seem to be a problem because the participle is a noun. The plural could mean many turnings away from sin, but I can't think how to put that in English.
Sincerely yours,
Steve Miller
Detroit
http://www.voiceInWilderness.info
Honesty is the best policy. - George Washington (1732-99)

User avatar
SteveMiller
Posts: 174
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 7:53 pm
Location: Detroit, MI, USA
Contact:

Re: Isa 59:20 compared to Rom 11:26

Postby SteveMiller » Thu May 18, 2017 11:06 pm

Jemoh66 wrote:Speaking of Paul, I think it is fair to assume he had access to the Hebrew, and being the finest rabbinic mind of the day, knew it quite well. If the Greek is to be trusted as that which Paul dictated, then I would have no problem with the idea that Paul agreed with the LXX reading, and believed that it was faithful to the Hebrew.


Thanks Jonathan. I agree.
But all English translations that I know of translate it to the effect of "and unto them that turn from transgression", including all Christian translations.
This means either:
1. Today's understanding of the meaning of a BH participle or participle construct is wrong. The LXX translators and Paul knew something that today's translators don't.
or
2. The MT and DSS texts are wrong as well as the texts used by Symmachus, Aquila and Theodotion.
Sincerely yours,
Steve Miller
Detroit
http://www.voiceInWilderness.info
Honesty is the best policy. - George Washington (1732-99)

Jemoh66
Posts: 204
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2013 11:03 pm

Re: Isa 59:20 compared to Rom 11:26

Postby Jemoh66 » Fri May 19, 2017 9:43 am

SteveMiller wrote:
Jemoh66 wrote:Speaking of Paul, I think it is fair to assume he had access to the Hebrew, and being the finest rabbinic mind of the day, knew it quite well. If the Greek is to be trusted as that which Paul dictated, then I would have no problem with the idea that Paul agreed with the LXX reading, and believed that it was faithful to the Hebrew.


Thanks Jonathan. I agree.
But all English translations that I know of translate it to the effect of "and unto them that turn from transgression", including all Christian translations.
This means either:
1. Today's understanding of the meaning of a BH participle or participle construct is wrong. The LXX translators and Paul knew something that today's translators don't.
or
2. The MT and DSS texts are wrong as well as the texts used by Symmachus, Aquila and Theodotion.


I agree.
Jonathan E Mohler
Studying for a MA in Intercultural Studies
Baptist Bible Theological Seminary

Isaac Fried
Posts: 808
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2013 8:32 pm

Re: Isa 59:20 compared to Rom 11:26

Postby Isaac Fried » Fri May 19, 2017 12:50 pm

Not only "the turn-arounder of ungodliness", but moreover "the coming backers to godliness".

Isaac Fried, Boston University

kwrandolph
Posts: 754
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2013 12:51 am

Re: Isa 59:20 compared to Rom 11:26

Postby kwrandolph » Thu May 25, 2017 6:04 pm

SteveMiller wrote:
kwrandolph wrote:When a participle is a noun, it usually refers to an actor or an action.

Do you know an example where a participle refers to an action rather than an actor?


Sorry I didn’t answer you earlier. I have seen participles referring to actions so often I didn’t bother to list any. Then when you asked the question of where, my mind went blank, where???

Examples include Proverbs 6:22 “in your lying down” and Nehemiah 2:6 “your going”. “Your saying” is found in Jeremiah 2:35, Ezekiel 25:3, 35:10.

SteveMiller wrote:
kwrandolph wrote:The fact that שבי would be plural if it were from שוב is one of the problems I have with the traditional translation. It’s equally a problem with your translation. That the noun there is a plural, that is one of the reasons I considered “captive” as the translation.


Why would שבי being plural be a problem for the traditional translation "and for them that turn away sin"?
In my translation, I was thinking plural may be a problem because the subject, "redeemer", is singular, but that doesn't seem to be a problem because the participle is a noun. The plural could mean many turnings away from sin, but I can't think how to put that in English.


Let’s go back to the verse in question:

ובא לציון גואל ולשבי פשע ביעקב—נאם יהוה


The word שבי could be either a participle from שוב as a plural in construct, or it could mean “captive” singular or “captives” plural in construct. (I misstated my case above, it’s more the context than the plural per se.) Then what is this ביעקב “in or among Jacob”? How does גואל fit in for those who turn aside, or turn back, rebellion? I find I have more questions than answers. I’m willing to admit that the MT has a mistake here, a mistake that was already in the Great Isaiah Scroll. Change one letter, ולשבו changes the reading to “in order for his turning aside rebellion…” gives us basically the same reading as the LXX. There are other verses where we have evidence of waws being misread as yods and visa versa, is that what has happened here?

Just my 2¢ here.

Karl W. Randolph.

kwrandolph
Posts: 754
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2013 12:51 am

Re: Isa 59:20 compared to Rom 11:26

Postby kwrandolph » Sat Jun 03, 2017 12:35 pm

An update to my last message:

I just looked up the photographed copy of the Great Isaiah Scroll online (probably should have done so earlier). The scribe who wrote it was rather sloppy in his writing—many of his yods look like waws and visa versa. The yod in question that I mentioned in my last message was written in a way identical with other yods and waws. In the verse itself, the word is וישבו in that the final letter is very different from the earlier yod in the word.

I take this as evidence that the MT has a copyist error, that the correct spelling should be ולשבו, a reading supported by the LXX.

Just my 2¢.

What do you all think?

Karl W. Randolph.

Ps: http://dss.collections.imj.org.il/isaiah#59:20

Jemoh66
Posts: 204
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2013 11:03 pm

Re: Isa 59:20 compared to Rom 11:26

Postby Jemoh66 » Sat Jun 03, 2017 6:26 pm

It looks to me like the top part of the lamed has faded, but you can see its trace.
Isaiah 59-20.png
Isaiah 59-20.png (57.86 KiB) Viewed 401 times
Jonathan E Mohler
Studying for a MA in Intercultural Studies
Baptist Bible Theological Seminary

Jemoh66
Posts: 204
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2013 11:03 pm

Re: Isa 59:20 compared to Rom 11:26

Postby Jemoh66 » Sat Jun 03, 2017 6:43 pm

just ahead you can clearly make out the difference between his yod's and his vav's. Red circles for yod's and green ones for vav's.
Isaiah Scroll-yods and vavs.png
Isaiah Scroll-yods and vavs.png (56.27 KiB) Viewed 401 times
Jonathan E Mohler
Studying for a MA in Intercultural Studies
Baptist Bible Theological Seminary

Jemoh66
Posts: 204
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2013 11:03 pm

Re: Isa 59:20 compared to Rom 11:26

Postby Jemoh66 » Sat Jun 03, 2017 7:17 pm

He's quite consistent across the entire verse with the yod's.
Isaiah Scroll - yods across 59-20.png
Isaiah Scroll - yods across 59-20.png (160.99 KiB) Viewed 397 times

So I don't see this scribe as having a vav on the end of the word. What I see is ולשבי, not ולשבו.
I think someone else noticed this as well earlier in the thread: that he has el tzion, not l'tzion.
Jonathan E Mohler
Studying for a MA in Intercultural Studies
Baptist Bible Theological Seminary


Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests