Comparing morphology
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2018 2:26 pm
I am in the process of comparing the Hebrew morphology as encoded by the OpenScriptures initiative with the work of the Amsterdam people at the ETCBC. The former is based on the WLC, the latter on the BHS.
I am using Text-Fabric in Jupyter notebooks. The first task was to align the words in both sources, and from there we can start comparing the morphology piece by piece. Currently, language and part-of-speech have been compared.
The comparison is redoable, because the OSM is not yet finished. 90%.
The purpose of comparing is improving the quality of morphology wherever possible and to gain more insight on what insights the assignment of morphology is based.
You can start here: https://github.com/ETCBC/bridging/tree/master/programs
The alignment is done in https://github.com/ETCBC/bridging/blob/ ... eOSM.ipynb,
The comparisons in https://github.com/ETCBC/bridging/blob/ ... uage.ipynb and https://github.com/ETCBC/bridging/blob/ ... eech.ipynb .
Let me know what you think.
I am using Text-Fabric in Jupyter notebooks. The first task was to align the words in both sources, and from there we can start comparing the morphology piece by piece. Currently, language and part-of-speech have been compared.
The comparison is redoable, because the OSM is not yet finished. 90%.
The purpose of comparing is improving the quality of morphology wherever possible and to gain more insight on what insights the assignment of morphology is based.
You can start here: https://github.com/ETCBC/bridging/tree/master/programs
The alignment is done in https://github.com/ETCBC/bridging/blob/ ... eOSM.ipynb,
The comparisons in https://github.com/ETCBC/bridging/blob/ ... uage.ipynb and https://github.com/ETCBC/bridging/blob/ ... eech.ipynb .
Let me know what you think.