Neither J/M or GKC have much to say on the paseq. I found the evidence in James Kennedy's The Note-Line in the Hebrew Scriptures Commonly Called Pāsēq, or Pěsîq to be convincing from the large body of evidence examined. My take from Kennedy is that the paseq (or note-line) is roughly analogous to the Latin sic. Do others here find Kennedy convincing?
It seems odd that a modern study has not been made of the paseq. Or am I missing something?
Thanks!
Jonah
Modern consensus on the paseq?
Forum rules
Members will observe the rules for respectful discourse at all times!
Please sign all posts with your first and last (family) name.
Members will observe the rules for respectful discourse at all times!
Please sign all posts with your first and last (family) name.