Is this analysis of Isaiah 9:6 a legitimate one?
Forum rules
Members will observe the rules for respectful discourse at all times!
Please sign all posts with your first and last (family) name.
Members will observe the rules for respectful discourse at all times!
Please sign all posts with your first and last (family) name.
-
- Posts: 297
- Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2013 9:02 am
- Location: Carlisle, Arkansas, USA
Re: Is this analysis of Isaiah 9:6 a legitimate one?
Returning for a moment to the question of whether "name" can be used with multiple names, it may be helpful to compare Isa. 8:1-3. There Isaiah is instructed to write on a scroll before witnesses מַהֵ֥ר שָׁלָ֖ל חָ֥שׁ בַּֽז, Maher-Shalal-Hash-Baz (NIV 2011). So Isaiah makes love to his wife, "the prophetess", and they have a son. God instructs Isaiah to קְרָ֣א שְׁמ֔וֹ מַהֵ֥ר שָׁלָ֖ל חָ֥שׁ בַּֽז׃. The NIV footnote on 8:1 reads, "Maher-Shalal-Hash-Baz means quick to the plunder, swift to the spoil".
Now this name has several components and is quite lengthy; it is allegedly the longest name in Scripture. Yet Isaiah has no problem using the singular שְׁמ֔וֹ, "name" to describe it. Not an exact parallel, I grant, to the "name" in 9:6. But, perhaps, the grammar point is worth considering.
Now this name has several components and is quite lengthy; it is allegedly the longest name in Scripture. Yet Isaiah has no problem using the singular שְׁמ֔וֹ, "name" to describe it. Not an exact parallel, I grant, to the "name" in 9:6. But, perhaps, the grammar point is worth considering.
Dewayne Dulaney
דואיין דוליני
Blog: https://letancientvoicesspeak.wordpress.com/
כִּ֤י שֶׁ֨מֶשׁ׀ וּמָגֵן֮ יְהוָ֪ה אֱלֹ֫הִ֥ים חֵ֣ן וְ֭כָבוֹד יִתֵּ֣ן יְהוָ֑ה לֹ֥א יִמְנַע־ט֝֗וֹב לַֽהֹלְכִ֥ים בְּתָמִֽים׃
--(E 84:11) 84:12 תהלים
דואיין דוליני
Blog: https://letancientvoicesspeak.wordpress.com/
כִּ֤י שֶׁ֨מֶשׁ׀ וּמָגֵן֮ יְהוָ֪ה אֱלֹ֫הִ֥ים חֵ֣ן וְ֭כָבוֹד יִתֵּ֣ן יְהוָ֑ה לֹ֥א יִמְנַע־ט֝֗וֹב לַֽהֹלְכִ֥ים בְּתָמִֽים׃
--(E 84:11) 84:12 תהלים
- SteveMiller
- Posts: 465
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 7:53 pm
- Location: Detroit, MI, USA
- Contact:
Re: Is this analysis of Isaiah 9:6 a legitimate one?
In addition to what Dewayne shared, here is one place with 2 names, that uses "name" singular:
Gen 31:48b עַל־כֵּ֥ן קָרָֽא־שְׁמ֖וֹ גַּלְעֵֽד
49 וְהַמִּצְפָּה֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר אָמַ֔ר יִ֥צֶף יְהוָ֖ה בֵּינִ֣י וּבֵינֶ֑ךָ כִּ֥י נִסָּתֵ֖ר אִ֥ישׁ מֵרֵעֵֽהוּ׃
Gen 31:48b Therefore was the name of it called Galeed,
49 -- and Mizpah; for he said, Let Jehovah watch between me and thee, when we shall be hidden one from another:
Gen 31:48b עַל־כֵּ֥ן קָרָֽא־שְׁמ֖וֹ גַּלְעֵֽד
49 וְהַמִּצְפָּה֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר אָמַ֔ר יִ֥צֶף יְהוָ֖ה בֵּינִ֣י וּבֵינֶ֑ךָ כִּ֥י נִסָּתֵ֖ר אִ֥ישׁ מֵרֵעֵֽהוּ׃
Gen 31:48b Therefore was the name of it called Galeed,
49 -- and Mizpah; for he said, Let Jehovah watch between me and thee, when we shall be hidden one from another:
Sincerely yours,
Steve Miller
Detroit
http://www.voiceInWilderness.info
Honesty is the best policy. - George Washington (1732-99)
Steve Miller
Detroit
http://www.voiceInWilderness.info
Honesty is the best policy. - George Washington (1732-99)
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2018 7:05 am
Re: Is this analysis of Isaiah 9:6 a legitimate one?
I realize this thread is old, but I just saw this.
Although I myself am not a Trinitarian either (I do believe Jesus is God Almighty), the author flubs in many assertions on his video. In the small clip I watched I noticed that he stated that no NT writer applied Isaiah 9.6 to Jesus. This is highly debatable based upon Matthew 28.19—which many academics view as an allusion or echo of Isaiah 9.6. In both texts you have one “name” for eternal Father, Son and Mighty God. This makes great sense inasmuch as Matthew is addressing Jews is his polemic to convince them that Jesus is their Christ who the OT prophets spoke of, hence, Matthew quotes the OT far more than the other gospels...and it makes great sense that he would conclude his argument by referencing this infamous OT Messianic prophecy.
Also, the author includes the article for “the mighty God, the everlasting Father”...when both Hebrew terms are anarthrous (i.e., lacking the article). I realize that the singular “name” could be evidence of a definitive construction in this text, just pointing out that, technically, there is no article used w. these Hebrew terms.
I’m certainly still in the learning phase myself (only have 1st year Hebrew under my belt). I do enjoy gleaning from this forum though. Just my thoughts.
Although I myself am not a Trinitarian either (I do believe Jesus is God Almighty), the author flubs in many assertions on his video. In the small clip I watched I noticed that he stated that no NT writer applied Isaiah 9.6 to Jesus. This is highly debatable based upon Matthew 28.19—which many academics view as an allusion or echo of Isaiah 9.6. In both texts you have one “name” for eternal Father, Son and Mighty God. This makes great sense inasmuch as Matthew is addressing Jews is his polemic to convince them that Jesus is their Christ who the OT prophets spoke of, hence, Matthew quotes the OT far more than the other gospels...and it makes great sense that he would conclude his argument by referencing this infamous OT Messianic prophecy.
Also, the author includes the article for “the mighty God, the everlasting Father”...when both Hebrew terms are anarthrous (i.e., lacking the article). I realize that the singular “name” could be evidence of a definitive construction in this text, just pointing out that, technically, there is no article used w. these Hebrew terms.
I’m certainly still in the learning phase myself (only have 1st year Hebrew under my belt). I do enjoy gleaning from this forum though. Just my thoughts.
Roger Perkins
https://apostolicacademics.com/
https://apostolicacademics.com/
- Kirk Lowery
- Site Admin
- Posts: 363
- Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 12:03 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Contact:
Re: Is this analysis of Isaiah 9:6 a legitimate one?
Please note that forum policy is to sign every post with your first and last name. This can be done by changing your user name (I, as moderator, can do that), put your name into a signature, or sign at the bottom of every post.
Thanks!
Kirk
Thanks!
Kirk
-
- Posts: 669
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2015 3:05 pm
Re: Is this analysis of Isaiah 9:6 a legitimate one?
Homeskillet,
If you are interested in alternative and strange new translations of Isaiah 9:5-6, I have a PDF with a lot of alternatives I have thought of on my site: http://www.hebrewbiblequotes.com/
See volume 2 on page 61.
Kenneth Greifer
If you are interested in alternative and strange new translations of Isaiah 9:5-6, I have a PDF with a lot of alternatives I have thought of on my site: http://www.hebrewbiblequotes.com/
See volume 2 on page 61.
Kenneth Greifer
Kenneth Greifer
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2018 7:05 am
Re: Is this analysis of Isaiah 9:6 a legitimate one?
Thank you. Will look into this.Kenneth Greifer wrote:Homeskillet,
If you are interested in alternative and strange new translations of Isaiah 9:5-6, I have a PDF with a lot of alternatives I have thought of on my site: http://www.hebrewbiblequotes.com/
See volume 2 on page 61.
Kenneth Greifer
Roger Perkins
Roger Perkins
https://apostolicacademics.com/
https://apostolicacademics.com/
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2018 7:05 am
Re: Is this analysis of Isaiah 9:6 a legitimate one?
Will do!Kirk Lowery wrote:Please note that forum policy is to sign every post with your first and last name. This can be done by changing your user name (I, as moderator, can do that), put your name into a signature, or sign at the bottom of every post.
Thanks!
Kirk
Roger Perkins
Roger Perkins
https://apostolicacademics.com/
https://apostolicacademics.com/
-
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2013 2:05 pm
- Location: Canada
Re: Is this analysis of Isaiah 9:6 a legitimate one?
Roger, if you decide to look at Kenneth's material, you may find this recent thread also to be of interest (if you've not already seen it): viewtopic.php?f=12&t=22301&p=28770#p28770Kenneth Greifer wrote:Homeskillet,
If you are interested in alternative and strange new translations of Isaiah 9:5-6, I have a PDF with a lot of alternatives I have thought of on my site: http://www.hebrewbiblequotes.com/
See volume 2 on page 61.
Kenneth Greifer
John McKinnon
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2018 7:05 am
Re: Is this analysis of Isaiah 9:6 a legitimate one?
Yes, I did see that thread actually. Much appreciated.Schubert wrote:Roger, if you decide to look at Kenneth's material, you may find this recent thread also to be of interest (if you've not already seen it): viewtopic.php?f=12&t=22301&p=28770#p28770Kenneth Greifer wrote:Homeskillet,
If you are interested in alternative and strange new translations of Isaiah 9:5-6, I have a PDF with a lot of alternatives I have thought of on my site: http://www.hebrewbiblequotes.com/
See volume 2 on page 61.
Kenneth Greifer
Roger Perkins
https://apostolicacademics.com/
https://apostolicacademics.com/
-
- Posts: 669
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2015 3:05 pm
Re: Is this analysis of Isaiah 9:6 a legitimate one?
Roger,
I looked at your blog, and I realize that you are very interested in monotheism and the Bible, so instead of looking at my ideas for Isaiah 9:5-6, maybe you could look at volume 1, chapters 2-5 and 9. I discuss a lot of things about monotheism that you might find a interesting for your debates.
Kenneth Greifer
I looked at your blog, and I realize that you are very interested in monotheism and the Bible, so instead of looking at my ideas for Isaiah 9:5-6, maybe you could look at volume 1, chapters 2-5 and 9. I discuss a lot of things about monotheism that you might find a interesting for your debates.
Kenneth Greifer
Kenneth Greifer