Vernacular Hebrew after 537 BC
Forum rules
Members will observe the rules for respectful discourse at all times!
Please sign all posts with your first and last (family) name.
Members will observe the rules for respectful discourse at all times!
Please sign all posts with your first and last (family) name.
-
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2013 9:02 am
- Location: Carlisle, Arkansas, USA
Re: Vernacular Hebrew after 537 BC
I'd like to see that challenge answered also. As for the idea that every single person in Judah was exiled, not so. See 2 Kgs. 24:14 and 25:11-12. The poorest people were left to work the vineyards and fields. My guess would be that those folks kept speaking Hebrew. Why not?
Dewayne Dulaney
דואיין דוליני
ܕܘܝܢ ܕܘܠܝܢܝ
Blog: https://letancientvoicesspeak.wordpress.com/
כִּ֤י שֶׁ֨מֶשׁ׀ וּמָגֵן֮ יְהוָ֪ה אֱלֹ֫הִ֥ים חֵ֣ן וְ֭כָבוֹד יִתֵּ֣ן יְהוָ֑ה לֹ֥א יִמְנַע־ט֝֗וֹב לַֽהֹלְכִ֥ים בְּתָמִֽים׃
--(E 84:11) 84:12 תהלים
דואיין דוליני
ܕܘܝܢ ܕܘܠܝܢܝ
Blog: https://letancientvoicesspeak.wordpress.com/
כִּ֤י שֶׁ֨מֶשׁ׀ וּמָגֵן֮ יְהוָ֪ה אֱלֹ֫הִ֥ים חֵ֣ן וְ֭כָבוֹד יִתֵּ֣ן יְהוָ֑ה לֹ֥א יִמְנַע־ט֝֗וֹב לַֽהֹלְכִ֥ים בְּתָמִֽים׃
--(E 84:11) 84:12 תהלים
- Jason Hare
- Posts: 1982
- Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2013 5:07 am
- Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
- Contact:
Re: Vernacular Hebrew after 537 BC
Wait... why wouldn’t farmers learn Aramaic while working the land? Wouldn’t it make sense for them to take the time to learn a language from 750 miles to the east that had little to do with their day-to-day lives? You’ve lost me.talmid56 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2024 2:12 pm I'd like to see that challenge answered also. As for the idea that every single person in Judah was exiled, not so. See 2 Kgs. 24:14 and 25:11-12. The poorest people were left to work the vineyards and fields. My guess would be that those folks kept speaking Hebrew. Why not?
Jason Hare
Tel Aviv, Israel
The Hebrew Café
עִ֣יר פְּ֭רוּצָה אֵ֣ין חוֹמָ֑ה אִ֝֗ישׁ אֲשֶׁ֤ר אֵ֖ין מַעְצָ֣ר לְרוּחֽוֹ׃
ספר משלי כ״ה, כ״ח
Tel Aviv, Israel
The Hebrew Café
עִ֣יר פְּ֭רוּצָה אֵ֣ין חוֹמָ֑ה אִ֝֗ישׁ אֲשֶׁ֤ר אֵ֖ין מַעְצָ֣ר לְרוּחֽוֹ׃
ספר משלי כ״ה, כ״ח
-
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2013 9:02 am
- Location: Carlisle, Arkansas, USA
Re: Vernacular Hebrew after 537 BC
I love the smell of sarcasm in the morning (or evening).
Dewayne Dulaney
דואיין דוליני
ܕܘܝܢ ܕܘܠܝܢܝ
Blog: https://letancientvoicesspeak.wordpress.com/
כִּ֤י שֶׁ֨מֶשׁ׀ וּמָגֵן֮ יְהוָ֪ה אֱלֹ֫הִ֥ים חֵ֣ן וְ֭כָבוֹד יִתֵּ֣ן יְהוָ֑ה לֹ֥א יִמְנַע־ט֝֗וֹב לַֽהֹלְכִ֥ים בְּתָמִֽים׃
--(E 84:11) 84:12 תהלים
דואיין דוליני
ܕܘܝܢ ܕܘܠܝܢܝ
Blog: https://letancientvoicesspeak.wordpress.com/
כִּ֤י שֶׁ֨מֶשׁ׀ וּמָגֵן֮ יְהוָ֪ה אֱלֹ֫הִ֥ים חֵ֣ן וְ֭כָבוֹד יִתֵּ֣ן יְהוָ֑ה לֹ֥א יִמְנַע־ט֝֗וֹב לַֽהֹלְכִ֥ים בְּתָמִֽים׃
--(E 84:11) 84:12 תהלים
-
- Posts: 366
- Joined: Thu May 13, 2021 8:00 am
Re: Vernacular Hebrew after 537 BC
I am so impatient I can not wait for Karl, I doubt he will take up the challenge. I was going to quote a few scenarios from the the New Testament writings to establish that Hebrew was still spoken by the common man, even while he was outside of Israel, the evidence is there. But I decided instead to dig up an article from the Jewish Quarterly review dated 2nd Oct 1951 Number 42. Page 193 to 212 written by Chomsky. He provided enough evidence from many sources that put an end to this nonsense. The evidence is loud and clear.
Oh, If anyone has this article I would appreciate a copy. Many of the Jewish quarterly reviews are readily available free and legal to download from two different sites that I have, unfortunately not the year 1951, a mystery.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/1453249?re ... b_contents
Chris watts
Oh, If anyone has this article I would appreciate a copy. Many of the Jewish quarterly reviews are readily available free and legal to download from two different sites that I have, unfortunately not the year 1951, a mystery.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/1453249?re ... b_contents
Chris watts
-
- Posts: 1614
- Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2013 12:51 am
Re: Vernacular Hebrew after 537 BC
Look at Jeremiah, who was a direct witness to the action, 43:1–7 also 44:1. “All” meant all.talmid56 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2024 2:12 pm I'd like to see that challenge answered also. As for the idea that every single person in Judah was exiled, not so. See 2 Kgs. 24:14 and 25:11-12. The poorest people were left to work the vineyards and fields. My guess would be that those folks kept speaking Hebrew. Why not?
Karl W. Randolph.
-
- Posts: 1614
- Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2013 12:51 am
Re: Vernacular Hebrew after 537 BC
Chris, you were too impatient. I was away from my computer for one day.Chris Watts wrote: ↑Thu Oct 03, 2024 11:54 am I am so impatient I can not wait for Karl, I doubt he will take up the challenge.
There is a difference between speaking a language as a second language, and learning the language at one’s mother’s knee. Just speaking the language is not evidence that it was a natively spoken language.Chris Watts wrote: ↑Thu Oct 03, 2024 11:54 am I was going to quote a few scenarios from the the New Testament writings to establish that Hebrew was still spoken by the common man, even while he was outside of Israel, the evidence is there.
By your definition of “vernacular”, Latin, which is still spoken, is a vernacular language. I don’t know of anyone who would agree with you.
Karl W. Randolph.
-
- Posts: 366
- Joined: Thu May 13, 2021 8:00 am
Re: Vernacular Hebrew after 537 BC
There are a hundred things I wanted to say, evidence that seriously challenges your reasoning, from both the Tanach and the Acts of the Apostles, not to mention outside facts of proven reputability, I wrote a whole post about 45 minutes ago but have deleted it. Karl your pedantic replies constantly re-inforce my feelings that you simply do not want engage with what challenges your beliefs on these two issues. I am finished with you on these particular topics.
Chris watts
Chris watts
- Jason Hare
- Posts: 1982
- Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2013 5:07 am
- Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
- Contact:
Re: Vernacular Hebrew after 537 BC
“‘All’ means ‘all’” is a terrible argument. People frequently use hyperbole.kwrandolph wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2024 9:44 pm Look at Jeremiah, who was a direct witness to the action, 43:1–7 also 44:1. “All” meant all.
Karl W. Randolph.
Jason Hare
Tel Aviv, Israel
The Hebrew Café
עִ֣יר פְּ֭רוּצָה אֵ֣ין חוֹמָ֑ה אִ֝֗ישׁ אֲשֶׁ֤ר אֵ֖ין מַעְצָ֣ר לְרוּחֽוֹ׃
ספר משלי כ״ה, כ״ח
Tel Aviv, Israel
The Hebrew Café
עִ֣יר פְּ֭רוּצָה אֵ֣ין חוֹמָ֑ה אִ֝֗ישׁ אֲשֶׁ֤ר אֵ֖ין מַעְצָ֣ר לְרוּחֽוֹ׃
ספר משלי כ״ה, כ״ח
-
- Posts: 366
- Joined: Thu May 13, 2021 8:00 am
Re: Vernacular Hebrew after 537 BC
It is, for me certainly, a poignant point to consider that when Hadrian sent in three legions and more to put down the Bar Kochba armies in 133 AD thereabouts - the historians of the day especially Cassius Dios (?) and many others recorded at least half a million dead, 900 towns destroyed and thousands sold into slavery and hundreds taken to the arenas. The land was emptied and the Land destroyed utterly. Now I can not read latin, but I know without a doubt that words such as 'All' and 'Utterly destroyed" and "no one left" are words employed by these writers to express and elevate the 'SENSE' of the event rather than the 'Actuality'. For these same historians record how many Jews settled along the coasts of Galilee and even further south beyond the Shephalah, and we know that the Mishna began in Galilee here around 200 AD, and NOT IN ARAMAIC either. ALthough Jews were forbidden from even coming within a few miles of Jerusalem, and the land was utterly devastated by 135 AD Jews actually remained.
Now this destruction of Israel was 10 times worse than the ones inflicted by Nebuchadnezzar's father in 603 BC, and then by his son in 597 and 587 BC, so much worse was Rome's than Babylon's. Yet there is clear evidence of a Jewish minority living and remaining in the land.
Chris watts
Now this destruction of Israel was 10 times worse than the ones inflicted by Nebuchadnezzar's father in 603 BC, and then by his son in 597 and 587 BC, so much worse was Rome's than Babylon's. Yet there is clear evidence of a Jewish minority living and remaining in the land.
Chris watts
- Jason Hare
- Posts: 1982
- Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2013 5:07 am
- Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
- Contact:
Re: Vernacular Hebrew after 537 BC
“I have spoken openly to the world,” Jesus replied. “I always taught in synagogues or at the temple, where all the Jews come together. I said nothing in secret.” (John 18:20, NIV)
Does “all” mean “all” here? All of the Jews come to the synagogue and to the temple without exception?A man named Ananias came to see me. He was a devout observer of the law and highly respected by all the Jews living there. (Acts 22:12, NIV)
Is it true that Ananias was respected by ALL of the Jews? Has there ever been a single person in history that was respected by an ENTIRE people group without exception, even among a specific ethnogroup within a given area? No exceptions? Really?I contest that the claim that “all means all” is just foolish.
Jason Hare
Tel Aviv, Israel
The Hebrew Café
עִ֣יר פְּ֭רוּצָה אֵ֣ין חוֹמָ֑ה אִ֝֗ישׁ אֲשֶׁ֤ר אֵ֖ין מַעְצָ֣ר לְרוּחֽוֹ׃
ספר משלי כ״ה, כ״ח
Tel Aviv, Israel
The Hebrew Café
עִ֣יר פְּ֭רוּצָה אֵ֣ין חוֹמָ֑ה אִ֝֗ישׁ אֲשֶׁ֤ר אֵ֖ין מַעְצָ֣ר לְרוּחֽוֹ׃
ספר משלי כ״ה, כ״ח