Jehovah vs Yahweh
Forum rules
Members will observe the rules for respectful discourse at all times!
Please sign all posts with your first and last (family) name.
Members will observe the rules for respectful discourse at all times!
Please sign all posts with your first and last (family) name.
- SteveMiller
- Posts: 465
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 7:53 pm
- Location: Detroit, MI, USA
- Contact:
Jehovah vs Yahweh
Why are scholars fairly sure that God's name is pronounced Yahweh? Is it just a guess? Is Jehovah just as good a guess?
Thanks.
Thanks.
Sincerely yours,
Steve Miller
Detroit
http://www.voiceInWilderness.info
Honesty is the best policy. - George Washington (1732-99)
Steve Miller
Detroit
http://www.voiceInWilderness.info
Honesty is the best policy. - George Washington (1732-99)
-
- Posts: 1548
- Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2013 12:51 am
Re: Jehovah vs Yahweh
Steve:
The story told to me is that the name “Yahweh” was an invention of Gesenius, and because he is held in such high regard most scholars follow him. As far as I know, most modern dictionaries from ancient Hebrew to English are basically updates of his dictionary.
Because ancient Greek had neither “h” nor “w”, the jumble of vowels used to transliterate the name can be read as anything from “Yahweh” to “Yehowah” to “Yehowahe” (the last one is the one that I think is most accurate, with the accent on the third syllable).
The question on pronunciation came up on an earlier thread, which included the Greek transliterations. I probably should have saved those transliterations for this discussion.
Personally, I’m not dogmatic on any of the pronunciations. So take your pick.
Karl W. Randolph.
This is one of the few words, if not the only one, where scholars admit uncertainty in the pronunciation. It is generally recognized that the points for Adonai were added when YHWH was found in the text, which come out as “Jehovah” in English. This is probably the most common Kethib/Qere pair in Tanakh.SteveMiller wrote:Why are scholars fairly sure that God's name is pronounced Yahweh? Is it just a guess?
The story told to me is that the name “Yahweh” was an invention of Gesenius, and because he is held in such high regard most scholars follow him. As far as I know, most modern dictionaries from ancient Hebrew to English are basically updates of his dictionary.
Well, in actuality, yes.SteveMiller wrote:Is Jehovah just as good a guess?
Thanks.
Because ancient Greek had neither “h” nor “w”, the jumble of vowels used to transliterate the name can be read as anything from “Yahweh” to “Yehowah” to “Yehowahe” (the last one is the one that I think is most accurate, with the accent on the third syllable).
The question on pronunciation came up on an earlier thread, which included the Greek transliterations. I probably should have saved those transliterations for this discussion.
Personally, I’m not dogmatic on any of the pronunciations. So take your pick.
Karl W. Randolph.
- enkidu
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2013 9:11 pm
- Contact:
Re: Jehovah vs Yahweh
There are quite a few considerations which favour Yahweh over Jehovah. These include theophoric elements in names, sounds in cognate languages, transliterations into some languages, and so forth. Consequently it is widely believed that ו (waw) was pronounced as "w" not "v" and that "j" is just wrong (just look at how other names beginning with yod are read in modern translations). So while there will always be some uncertainty over the precise pronunciation (and there may have been some variation in pronunciation in different regions and at different times anyway), it is pretty certain that "Jehovah" is wrong while "Yahweh" is close.
Martin Shields,
Sydney, Australia.
Sydney, Australia.
- SteveMiller
- Posts: 465
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 7:53 pm
- Location: Detroit, MI, USA
- Contact:
Re: Jehovah vs Yahweh
Thanks Karl,
Why do you think “Yehowahe” is probably most accurate?
Martin,
Why do scholars say that the vav sounded like a w rather than a v? How did they come up with the vowels for Yahweh?
Thanks.
Why do you think “Yehowahe” is probably most accurate?
Martin,
Why do scholars say that the vav sounded like a w rather than a v? How did they come up with the vowels for Yahweh?
Thanks.
Sincerely yours,
Steve Miller
Detroit
http://www.voiceInWilderness.info
Honesty is the best policy. - George Washington (1732-99)
Steve Miller
Detroit
http://www.voiceInWilderness.info
Honesty is the best policy. - George Washington (1732-99)
-
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 4:41 pm
Re: Jehovah vs Yahweh
I believe the Moabite Stone/Mesha Stele has helped in understanding the V/W connection.
As for the vowels for Yahweh - The fact that names ending in -yh or -yhw are vocalised -yah or -yahu has convinced many, not to mention the Greek manuscripts from Qumran have it transliterated into Greek as Ιαω/Ιαο (The Hebrew Vav/waw transliterated into Greek as ω is the most common, so I'm not quite sure as to whether the Greek omega had more a -u rather than an -o sound than currently understood).
As for the vowels for Yahweh - The fact that names ending in -yh or -yhw are vocalised -yah or -yahu has convinced many, not to mention the Greek manuscripts from Qumran have it transliterated into Greek as Ιαω/Ιαο (The Hebrew Vav/waw transliterated into Greek as ω is the most common, so I'm not quite sure as to whether the Greek omega had more a -u rather than an -o sound than currently understood).
Ste Walch
- SteveMiller
- Posts: 465
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 7:53 pm
- Location: Detroit, MI, USA
- Contact:
Re: Jehovah vs Yahweh
Thanks Ste,
I can see that as a good reason for the "Yah" part of Yahweh, but why does Yahweh have no vowel sound with the H?
I still don't see why the vav is transliterated to a W, since omega did not sound like a W.
How would the Gk Ιαω/Ιαο be pronounced?
For comparison, do you know how Qumran transliterated the name Joshua into Greek?
I can see that as a good reason for the "Yah" part of Yahweh, but why does Yahweh have no vowel sound with the H?
I still don't see why the vav is transliterated to a W, since omega did not sound like a W.
How would the Gk Ιαω/Ιαο be pronounced?
For comparison, do you know how Qumran transliterated the name Joshua into Greek?
Sincerely yours,
Steve Miller
Detroit
http://www.voiceInWilderness.info
Honesty is the best policy. - George Washington (1732-99)
Steve Miller
Detroit
http://www.voiceInWilderness.info
Honesty is the best policy. - George Washington (1732-99)
-
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 4:41 pm
Re: Jehovah vs Yahweh
Does it need to have a vowel after the H?SteveMiller wrote:I can see that as a good reason for the "Yah" part of Yahweh, but why does Yahweh have no vowel sound with the H?
Did it not? I don't think we actually know how ancient Hebrew/Greek was pronounced.I still don't see why the vav is transliterated to a W, since omega did not sound like a W.
Seeing as though there're more than a few Hebrew names transliterated into Greek using ω for a Waw, one may find a correlation between the two.
I would guess it would be pronounced Ee-ah-ou - but that's just how I pronounce itHow would the Gk Ιαω/Ιαο be pronounced?
I don't believe there're any Greek manuscripts at Qumran that have Joshua transliterated. I know that the Greek Minor Prophets scroll doesn't have the name extant amongst its pages.For comparison, do you know how Qumran transliterated the name Joshua into Greek?
Ste Walch
-
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2013 11:03 pm
Re: Jehovah vs Yahweh
I believe the basic reason for this pronunciation is taken from the Samaritan pronunciation, [jɑ-vɛ'], taken from the Greek transliteration, Ἰαβέ. In my opinion it was probably pronounced with a /β/ (voiced biblabial fricative). Try to say a /v/ with both lips, instead of using your upper teeth touching the lower lip.SteveMiller wrote:Thanks Ste,
I can see that as a good reason for the "Yah" part of Yahweh, but why does Yahweh have no vowel sound with the H?
If the vav was a consonant, then it most surely was a /w/, not a /v/. However, it seems that by the time of the 2nd Temple period, that the Samaritans pronounced the vav at least as a /β/.SteveMiller wrote:I still don't see why the vav is transliterated to a W, since omega did not sound like a W.
[yao].SteveMiller wrote:How would the Gk Ιαω/Ιαο be pronounced?
Jonathan E Mohler
Studying for a MA in Intercultural Studies
Baptist Bible Theological Seminary
Studying for a MA in Intercultural Studies
Baptist Bible Theological Seminary
-
- Posts: 1548
- Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2013 12:51 am
Re: Jehovah vs Yahweh
I have seen more than one indication that in Biblical Hebrew, i.e. before the Babylonian Exile, that the writing was not an alphabet, rather a syllabary. As a syllabary, every consonant was followed by a vowel. That’s why indications of which vowels was not included, because people who were native speakers could recognize which vowels to include.SteveMiller wrote:Thanks Karl,
Why do you think “Yehowahe” is probably most accurate?
Jst lk ths sntnc, a ntv spkr of Englsh wd rcgnz whch vwls t insrt.
So a word with four letters would have had four syllables, four consonants each followed by a vowel. Hence the pronunciation would probably have been similar to Yehowahe. I suspect that the transliteration of יה came out as ιαω, that this was not the transliteration of the full four letter name.
The New Testament, one example Hebrews 4:8, mentions Joshua but transliterates that name as ιησους “Jesus”.S_Walch wrote:I don't believe there're any Greek manuscripts at Qumran that have Joshua transliterated. I know that the Greek Minor Prophets scroll doesn't have the name extant amongst its pages.For comparison, do you know how Qumran transliterated the name Joshua into Greek?
Ancient Greek also didn’t have the “v” sound, so transliterated that as “b”. When we look at names transliterated into Greek, the ו is almost always transliterated as a vowel, or omitted listing only its vowel, rather than giving a hard consonant.SteveMiller wrote:Why do scholars say that the vav sounded like a w rather than a v?
My understanding is that Yeminite pronunciation as well maintained that “w” sound until fairly recently.
Karl W. Randolph.
-
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 4:41 pm
Re: Jehovah vs Yahweh
Could the final ה not be a vowel, rather than a consonant?kwrandolph wrote:I have seen more than one indication that in Biblical Hebrew, i.e. before the Babylonian Exile, that the writing was not an alphabet, rather a syllabary. As a syllabary, every consonant was followed by a vowel. That’s why indications of which vowels was not included, because people who were native speakers could recognize which vowels to include.
Jst lk ths sntnc, a ntv spkr of Englsh wd rcgnz whch vwls t insrt.
So a word with four letters would have had four syllables, four consonants each followed by a vowel. Hence the pronunciation would probably have been similar to Yehowahe.
Also the orthography of Qumran would need to be looked at. There're more than a few times that we see readings like לכה for לך, and כיא for כי; so how Hebrew used it's vowel-consonants has changed over the centuries, as would be expected.
Well technically, it uses the nomen sacrum ι̅ς̅ (Papyrus 13) / ι̅η̅ς̅ (Papyrus 46), rather than doing a full transliteration.The New Testament, one example Hebrews 4:8, mentions Joshua but transliterates that name as ιησους “Jesus”.
This is also the case in most OG (Old Greek) manuscripts, where we see the Nomina Sacra used rather than full name transliteration for Joshua/Jesus when he's mentioned (look at MS2648 - link - see the Nomina Sacra quite clearly).
The transliteration of יהושׁוע is also further complicated in that we have it transliterated fully in the Lucian LXX recension as Ἰωσηε.
This is one of the things I really wish we had found at Qumran - a Hebrew-Greek transliterated list of names, for the transliteration of Hebrew-Greek names is not unanimous throughout our extant Greek manuscripts, of both the LXX and the GNT.
Ste Walch