Genesis 1.1
Forum rules
Members will observe the rules for respectful discourse at all times!
Please sign all posts with your first and last (family) name.
Members will observe the rules for respectful discourse at all times!
Please sign all posts with your first and last (family) name.
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2018 3:54 am
Genesis 1.1
In the beginning the Elohim created the heavens and the earth - why is Elohim plural but 'created' singular?
-
- Posts: 1548
- Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2013 12:51 am
Re: Genesis 1.1
The singular verb is easy, in that ancient Israel was monotheistic, as long as they obeyed Torah.existence wrote:In the beginning the Elohim created the heavens and the earth - why is Elohim plural but 'created' singular?
I’ve heard a few reasons for the plural of Elohim:
Probably the one that makes most sense is that this is a plural of respect of an inferior to a superior, the highest superior being God. We see this also in that the word “Lord” is usually plural even when referring to a single human master.
I’ve heard some say that this is similar to the “royal ‘We’” as used in English.
Some try to make a theological statement that this is a reference to the Trinity. I think this argument is weakened by the first reasons given above.
I hope this answers your question.
Karl W. Randolph.
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2018 3:54 am
Re: Genesis 1.1
I think there's more theological significance as the plurality is confirmed 3 times in verse 26 of the same chapter - and the Elohim said 'let us make ha adm in our image and in our likeness. Repetition by the writer is a literary device used by virtually all Bible writers to emphasize something important.
egs - Genesis 2.3 – Elohim blesses twice Genesis 13.6 – Abram and Lot could not live together twice – And the land was not able to bear them, that they may dwell together; for their substance was great, so that they could not dwell together.
egs - Genesis 2.3 – Elohim blesses twice Genesis 13.6 – Abram and Lot could not live together twice – And the land was not able to bear them, that they may dwell together; for their substance was great, so that they could not dwell together.
-
- Posts: 1548
- Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2013 12:51 am
Re: Genesis 1.1
In this verse the plurality is indicated by a different word—“our”.existence wrote:I think there's more theological significance as the plurality is confirmed 3 times in verse 26 of the same chapter - and the Elohim said 'let us make ha adm in our image and in our likeness.
This is a different question than your original one.existence wrote:Repetition by the writer is a literary device used by virtually all Bible writers to emphasize something important.
egs - Genesis 2.3 – Elohim blesses twice Genesis 13.6 – Abram and Lot could not live together twice – And the land was not able to bear them, that they may dwell together; for their substance was great, so that they could not dwell together.
Your original question is why is אלהים plural while using a singular verb? To which I replied, why is a singular human “lord” even referring to the owner of a slave, often in plural? Does that not indicate that we are dealing with a linguistic issue, and not necessarily a theological one? It’s for this reason that I don’t push a theological answer for your original question.
Karl W. Randolph.
- SteveMiller
- Posts: 465
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 7:53 pm
- Location: Detroit, MI, USA
- Contact:
Re: Genesis 1.1
Karl,
Where is "lord" plural referring to a singular human master?
Where is "lord" plural referring to a singular human master?
Sincerely yours,
Steve Miller
Detroit
http://www.voiceInWilderness.info
Honesty is the best policy. - George Washington (1732-99)
Steve Miller
Detroit
http://www.voiceInWilderness.info
Honesty is the best policy. - George Washington (1732-99)
-
- Posts: 1548
- Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2013 12:51 am
Re: Genesis 1.1
Genesis 24:51SteveMiller wrote:Karl,
Where is "lord" plural referring to a singular human master?
Genesis 39:2–3, 7–8, 16, 19–20
Genesis 40:1, 7
Genesis 42:30, 33
Isaiah 19:4
and many more.
Compare to Proverbs 30:10 where “lord” is singular referring to a human master.
Karl W. Randolph.
- SteveMiller
- Posts: 465
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 7:53 pm
- Location: Detroit, MI, USA
- Contact:
Re: Genesis 1.1
Thanks Karl! I didn't know that.
You are right, that makes the plural of elohim not significant as far as God being triune.
You are right, that makes the plural of elohim not significant as far as God being triune.
Sincerely yours,
Steve Miller
Detroit
http://www.voiceInWilderness.info
Honesty is the best policy. - George Washington (1732-99)
Steve Miller
Detroit
http://www.voiceInWilderness.info
Honesty is the best policy. - George Washington (1732-99)
-
- Posts: 1548
- Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2013 12:51 am
Re: Genesis 1.1
Which is why I prefer other indicators to show that God is triune, starting with Genesis 1:2. Another example is Numbers 6:24–26 where each verse lists the primary function we receive from each person of the Trinity (שלום can come from either שלה meaning “peace” or שלם meaning “filling” as in “filled with the Spirit”). There are other verses as well.SteveMiller wrote:Thanks Karl! I didn't know that.
You are right, that makes the plural of elohim not significant as far as God being triune.
Karl W. Randolph.
- SteveMiller
- Posts: 465
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 7:53 pm
- Location: Detroit, MI, USA
- Contact:
Re: Genesis 1.1
thanks Karl!
Sincerely yours,
Steve Miller
Detroit
http://www.voiceInWilderness.info
Honesty is the best policy. - George Washington (1732-99)
Steve Miller
Detroit
http://www.voiceInWilderness.info
Honesty is the best policy. - George Washington (1732-99)
- SteveMiller
- Posts: 465
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 7:53 pm
- Location: Detroit, MI, USA
- Contact:
Re: Genesis 1.1
Karl,
Could you share your list of verses that show that God is triune.
I would like to keep them for reference.
thanks.
Could you share your list of verses that show that God is triune.
I would like to keep them for reference.
thanks.
Sincerely yours,
Steve Miller
Detroit
http://www.voiceInWilderness.info
Honesty is the best policy. - George Washington (1732-99)
Steve Miller
Detroit
http://www.voiceInWilderness.info
Honesty is the best policy. - George Washington (1732-99)